

running a report, exporting data, etc.)īeing able to define the UX metric also points us to another bugbear of modern IT environments – the focus of monitoring.

opening a document from a dialog box, entering data, etc.) The KPIs involved usually include things such as, but not limited to:. They normally work by combining together a set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that are used to extrapolate a specific UX reading. Certain technical solutions can aggregate key performance indicators together to produce a “UX” metric which serves as an indicator of the current level. Whilst difficult, it is possible to define to a certain degree the current level of user experience being delivered to users in the environment. Understanding how your users are feeling about the “experience” is vital, yet pinning it down to a specific “rating” can be incredibly difficult. UX can vary from user to user and department to department depending on how they interact with applications, and to what degree. UX is a holistic metric, encompassing the user’s overall feeling of satisfaction or engagement with not just one, but all of the systems at their disposal. There are many others, but these are the main issues that can go hand in hand with the delivery of a substandard user experience.īut a problem with defining and delivering a good user experience is that user experience (or UX) is that it isn’t particularly an objective definition.

